PREMESSA:
Non volevo affrontare nuovamente l'argomento. Tante volte l'ho fatto nei mesi passati e credevo di essere stata chiara sulla mia posizione in merito alle troppe facili adozioni dei nostri animali ( non solo cani! )in Germania. Evidentemente, tanta è la foga di chi la pensa diversamente che gli articoli da me pubblicati non sono stati letti con attenzione, quindi si ritorna in campo a combattere.
Questo post sarà piuttosto long, and certainly not so because I want, but I hope you have enough patience to read it all, in order to find some answers that many seek.
Yesterday, February 28, 2010 I get an email that I want to disclose all of you readers, as I have always done in the past. There are omitted
duties but the substance of the contents of this letter does not change. Democracy is a concept far removed, especially if it is working in the right way, or to defend a dramatic reality which has to raise awareness and move some consciousness. Taking into account the fact that those who should protect the animals you are not really working hard as it should, we bloggers is the only way forward, that is to make our voice heard through the power of the Internet and put it to good use.
Below the text of the email, then my analysis in further response to the points which I consider to be emphasized.
From: robyxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 02/28/10 05:02:36
To: tizianaxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: international adoptions
The site
http://stralci-di-un-pensiero.blogspot.com/ 2009/10/cani-
happy-in-germany-then-perche.html
is clear
your point of view on international adoptions. I currently do not have
points of view but I am gathering information (the sources, which is always better
).
Tuttavia non capisco la presa di posizione contro Laura
Fabbri e compagni di Rieti e quasi a favore della TECNOVETT.
Chi a
Rieti c'è stato non se la sentirebbe di parlare come lei: ho visto cani
provenire da quel canile e non depongono a favore del gestore-
proprietario.
Dal Suo sito peraltro non è chiaro se lei sia
attivamente impegnata sul fronte della prevenzione del randagismo in
qualche canile più o meno lager o parla per sentito dire o tanto per
dar aria alla bocca o pechè è più facile scrivere pensieri in libertà
su una tastiera che infangarsi insieme ai cani di canile. Infatti penso
che quelle ragazze non le abbiano risposto perchè use the time more
profiqua.
If you like, but perhaps not interested, the story
what I saw on Valentine's Day in Frankfurt after the German
a friend of mine who lived for years in Italy. Among other things, she is
never been to Germany?
For Valentine's Day was scheduled meetings between adoptive families and about 25 dogs from Spain.
The meeting was held at the home of the chairwoman of the name: HUNDEHILFE
HUNDEHERZE e.
V. (Http:
/ / www.hundeherzen.de).
The courtyard was soon animated festive these dogs, aside from a few more so. Gradually came the families: couples with children, leashes, harnesses and a few new coat, dog biscuits for the friendly welcome and leaving lipstick marks on the hairy chosen.
The components of the association have quietly done so to take the documents
adopters' and give them the international passport of the adopted dog. The new owners must register their pet in taxes, a sort of registry canine world, so if you lose your dog, for example in Chile, anyone having read the chip can be traced back to the owner in Germany. Over the last 6
years ago, when there is an association, have given up for adoption around 2000 dogs. The
dogs available for adoption are filed from the point with respect to behavior and health status and are included in their site. If someone wants to take contact the association going to do an inspection to see how that dog will be required. For example, a dog for a lady contact the association, saying it was a dog for himself. During the interview with the volunteer showed that the dog was not for himself but to keep company to her daughter that is only because of the work of the mother. Because the dog was not suitable to the situation that dog was not given, probably there is a dog for that situation, but could not be that. I was told that the family seek suitable for the dog and not a dog for the family. Or, another person wanted a dog and took in the garden. The dog was not given because he had to have the opportunity to stay at home to establish a good relationship with the "two-legged companion." As a result of the skill set of each when inspecting the post-foster care. E '
possible that a person who adopted a dog for some reason in the future can no longer keep him. Then the association feels responsible for that dog and will be held
by a volunteer until he is found another family.
Not all dogs just arrived from Spain had prepared a family: four were taken into custody by volunteers of the association until they had found a family that usually comes at the latest within 4 months, although some become attached and then hold it. So I asked some questions that arise spontaneously
: first of all, what makes a German family
to take a dog abroad? Perhaps they too have the strays?
Well, the information I have received have been many. First of all we
we have too many dogs, we have them on the street in certain regions, while they
the street do not.
Their kennels are exclusively local, for which there is the executive's kennel that thrive with stray: the municipalities or some combination
directly manage kennels and shelters.
also often are aware that there are situations in kennels, and worst of Europe German kennels and this pushes German families to choose a dog days. It 's a little bit what happens here: I know of local volunteers while knowing that emergencies in Italy
choose a dog from Spain or Romania, as there often are worse or at risk of death
sometimes violently. In addition, whenever a
kennel association is adopting a dog or the adopter pays a fee
animal protection, which a dog is about 200 €, you need to do check-up animals, sterilization, all even the males before giving it up for adoption, so that the adopter know exactly the state of health of the dog and has no surprises. Breeding is strictly
normed: there may be the amateur breeder
is constantly giving birth to his dog: the civic consciousness is sufficiently developed so that the neighbors saw the dog continually pregnant
report the situation to the Guard of Livestock and penalties are severe.
Volunteers kennel must have been a little over 4 hours before operation, can bring out the dogs from the kennel to know and to do
socialize with other animals, with cats and with other people.
E 'banned in Germany importing or mastiffs pitbull like that, even if
within the country you can breed them. Only then stocking fees are so high that private individuals are discouraged from averne.Dei dogs kept in kennels and shelters, 80% comes from private transfers and 20% from neglect. In fact, if a private
can no longer keep the animal transfers it to the local dog pound and paid a one-off figure.
I was also told that as well as in Italy, you can not take dogs from shelters
for experimentation. Now, since I believe that this could not be a gigantic sham, a plot to my own damage, it might be worth
investicare without preconceptions. But she
to write what he writes is documented on-site or only on the Internet? He realizes that circulates on the network of everything and its opposite at the risk for each of us to come to the wrong conclusions? Roberta
Benigni
ANALYSIS AND RESPONSE:
After this prologue I believe you are entitled to the nth replica public. We begin to say that civilization goes in two directions, so the aggressive approach I avoid it but my answer is definitely not friendly.
The pleasantries aside and let them discuss the same style of mail received.
This lady is not present, does not say who he is and what it does but pretends that I offer a life of my culliculum morality in the field of animal welfare. This lady attacks because they do not agree with his point of view and knows correctly that I never will be. This lady obviously did not understand much of the post with so much mention of any link in reference to an article published in mid-October 2009, delirious and draws conclusions on the content thereof.
Since I have neither time nor desire to repeat all that I can only ask the same Article, and if it is not enough to read it again, do it a hundred more. Reread my public response to Edgar Meyer, and find the answers that so craves.
In analysis, I want to emphasize certain passages in his long annoying mail. In bold are my answers.
1) However I do not understand taking a stand against Laura Fabbri and fellow Rieti and almost to the TECNOVETT. Who was there in Rieti not bring himself to talk like her, I saw dogs provenire da quel canile e non depongono a favore del gestore- proprietario.
Io sarei a favore della Tecnovett? Questo dimostra con quale leggerezza l'articolo è stato letto. E mi limito a dire questo per buona educazione. IO NON HO MAI DIFESO IL CANILE DI RIETI NELLA PERSONA DEI SUOI GESTORI/PROPRIETARI. Questo lo ha 'letto' lei, ma io non l'ho mai nè detto nè scritto, e lungi lontanamente da me farlo. Chiaro è che se non si vuole scendere a patti con il diavolo, non ci si firma un protocollo d'intesa. Non sono stata io a siglare con il mio nome e cognome un accordo, ergo la sua interpretazione del tutto soggettiva e discutibile non mi tange affatto. So quello che dico e mai ho espresso favore o difesa per la Tenovett. A Rieti we were all, including those who do not admit it, because the shameful pictures and from that concentration camp for animals have been around the world. Sometimes there is no need to go to hell to know that it exists.
2) From your website, however it is unclear whether she is actively engaged on prevention of stray dogs in the kennel a few more or less lager or speak from hearsay or just to give air to the mouth or peche is easier to write thoughts in freedom on a keyboard together with muddy dog \u200b\u200bkennels.
fact I think that those girls do not have responded because they use the time more profiqua.
Forget the mistakes grammar - made out to me but I leave as they are in faith to the letter, and get to the point of the matter. I'm so sick, but so sick of hearing the same things, the same phrases, the same old story! Let's change the stylus of the turntable because I believe that this litany have tired many others besides me. Dear lady, it is not clear commitment on my face because I do not need dell'aureola and applause of others to work. She does not know me but I think I can come for the sermon just because our thoughts will never meet, thank God!
I have done volunteer work for years, and two four-legged animals. In my day, although I have not yet thirty-nine, we did not need the red carpet to feel good when we did a good work. Even today, actually. Nobody gave us a pat on the back and even now, despite our constant efforts, we do not need or do we go looking for it. I was always enough to know that I was doing good in relation to my physical and economic, without overdoing it, without any public proclamations. I have always fought actively for the protection of animals and humans, and often, very often, I have faced situations hallucinating without asking anything to anyone. I have not bitten off more than you can chew and I never suggested to become the new Mother Teresa of Calcutta of the animal world. I did, and I just know I'm doing and see what che ho operato è cosa buona. E mi creda, cosa buona lo è veramente. Una ricchezza che il denaro non potrà mai comprare. I deliri di onnipotenza, oltre a non essere contemplati nel mio modo di pensare e di agire, li lascio a chi cerca solo una soddisfazione del proprio ego. Io mi accontento di poco pur facendo sacrifici immani. Nemmeno le sto a dire che lavoro quasi solo per sfamare e curare creature che nessuno ha voluto. Nemmeno le sto a raccontare che tirate faccio per far sì che tutto funzioni nel migliore dei modi. Io non cerco la gloria, non cerco l'immortalità. Io sono una peccatrice terrena come molti altri, ma mi creda, sapesse quanto è bello addormentarsi stanca morta e sapere che, nel mio piccolo molte vite sono state salvate o verranno Saved! All this in silence, not praise, and that's okay.
3) By the way, she's never been to Germany?
dramatically ... I have to laugh to laugh. Let's say you invited me in Germany and I'm leaving tomorrow morning? We do, once there, you can see and touch everything, not just what suits show? You do not know if I am in Germany, Finland, Norway have been there and I speak from knowledge of the facts? But for her it is obvious that it can not be. We are opposed because we know that for many, many years, many do not fit the trip of our animals abroad?
charges against her? No, if anything, clarifications what with great obstinacy will show you how Nirvana and no real evidence in hand for the general public. A specific place, a specific name in Germany and there I would be just me, believe me!
Please note that the phenomenon raises suspicions and doubts as early as the second half of the seventies too many of our dogs and cats see the journey of hope in Germany and Switzerland but were never able to get back to telling the story?
Is that enough! Thousands of animals vanished into thin air ...
The girls did not answer because I have decided to commit their time in a better way? I do not doubt at all. I too would have done without the loss of my precious time to point out once again my point of view, avvalorato da molti altri concordi. Sinceramente le dico che anche lei avrebbe fatto meglio ad impegnare il suo senza perdersi nella vacuità di internet. Ogni minuto buttato via per un copia/incolla generale di un testo è indebitamente sottratto alla cura e al benessere degli animali. Non crede?
4) Ma lei per scrivere quello che scrive si documenta sul posto o solo su Internet? Si rende conto che sulla rete circola di tutto e il suo contrario col rischio
per ognuno di noi di giungere a conclusioni sbagliate?
Guardi, io mi documento su tutto e in ogni dove, e in particolar modo su testimonianze fisiche di persone attendibilissime che hanno visto un loro animale sparire per luoghi definiti paradisiaci senza quasi neppure avere il tempo per accorgersene. Persone che sono ricorse a vie legali per riottenere il loro animale finito ignobilmente in laboratorio! Vogliamo aggiungere in quali condizioni questo è ritornato in madre patria? E questo per lei non è fonte ottimale?
Sul fatto che ci si documenta ANCHE su internet è fuori discussione, ma qui, se lo lasci dire con calore, qualcuno detiene un posto meravigliosamente privilegiato. Gli accoratissimi appelli non sono miei. I cani presenti contemporaneamente in Italia e Germania, in internet non ce li ho messi io. Gli insulti a chi non si dimostrava giustamente soddisfatto delle scarne informazioni sul dove si trova esattamente un animale, non li ho fatti io. Ora, visto che di tempo ne ho perso anche too, I find a minute or more to remind you that freedom of expression is a constitutional element of the absolute. Ask and answer is lawful and courtesy. If it were not informed, please read well for Art. 19 of our Constitution: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression, including the right not to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers" . Out of habit I always do my job well, and this both publicly and privately and tell her that the text of his mail has a tone that I do not like at all. She did not ask, she accuses. She took part for the party but will retain un diritto autoproclamato di fare la vittima e di spiegare ragioni in maniera discutibile ed arbitraria, tuttavia agli altri non è concesso mettere in discussione nulla. Un atteggiamento a dir poco totalitarista, non è d'accordo anche lei? O per andare d'accordo con voi bisogna pedissequamente pensare con la vostra testa?
Esprimo il mio legittimo dubbio se l'occasione lo richiede, e mi permetto di criticare ciò che non mi torna soprattutto dinanzi ad oggettività di cronaca e testimonianze oggettive. Per farla breve, no, non sono assolutamente d'accordo con i cosiddetti viaggi della speranza. No, non ci credo neanche lontanamente che i tedeschi o i giapponesi o i coreani -tanto per non citare sempre gli stessi- possano cercare un nostro animale after that unfortunate, tangible estimates, the number of animals present on their territory would be much higher than the population of the same place.
No, I do not believe that heaven exists on earth, especially when national newspaper articles constantly alert to destinations not so golden creatures that can not have their say. And do not think that in Italy there can be no room for these beings. Let's say someone makes it easier to say this and thus justify the dramatic increase of our animals to other shores.
In Germany there were many people I know so well in Switzerland, and what they tell is not really a fairytale for our animals. You are not on that side of the fence? Good for you, but do not be absurd claim that the world revolves around you is on your side only because you say so sentenced. As for my people, I think, that's okay. I know what I say and I'm not the only person feeling this way.
In the future, let us not waste any more precious time to attack those who disagree with your actions. This luxury you let us, who are camping from morning to night behind a PC and not 'help' anyone. We
, because I'm not really alone in this world blindfolded and ears plugged, you might not go down in history, but what do we do in the sacred silence, dirty hands and feet of shit kennel and cattery and we do not want trophies. We, when we close our eyes at night, we fight for the right and try to understand what is right there, but mostly just for animals and humans is not.
Tiziana Paghini
0 comments:
Post a Comment